The Stringfellow anthology. :-) I used it in my Radical Theologians course. And I vaguely know Bill -- we've corresponded once or twice and of course I was a big fan of his beloved Jeannie, the late editor of The Witness.
I'm glad you posted that, especially since I am really lax in reading Sojourners. They are doing such a useful job, yet I am ambivalent about them these days. Maybe I'm getting too much junk e-mail from them... Also I have some problems with Wallis -- not personally, I don't know him (though of course we are two-degrees-of-separation, he's a friend of a friend, etc.), but in some of his statements: very little gender analysis, and he ought to know better. Now shut mah mouth.
Thanks for filling in the word verification so that we know you're not a robot.
Comments are moderated, so there may be a slight delay before your comment is posted.
If you asked a question, please check back here for an answer. Come and visit again. (Unless you're selling something. We're not buying. So please, don't even try.)
When I saw that Wylie-Kellerman had published a Stringfellow anthology, I was pretty sure you'd be a fan!
ReplyDeleteThe Stringfellow anthology. :-) I used it in my Radical Theologians course. And I vaguely know Bill -- we've corresponded once or twice and of course I was a big fan of his beloved Jeannie, the late editor of The Witness.
ReplyDeleteI'm glad you posted that, especially since I am really lax in reading Sojourners. They are doing such a useful job, yet I am ambivalent about them these days. Maybe I'm getting too much junk e-mail from them... Also I have some problems with Wallis -- not personally, I don't know him (though of course we are two-degrees-of-separation, he's a friend of a friend, etc.), but in some of his statements: very little gender analysis, and he ought to know better. Now shut mah mouth.