Tuesday, March 18, 2008

The Rev. John H. Thomas responds to the Rev. Wright brouhaha: the whole text, because it's so good

I have long been an admirer of the Rev. John H. Thomas, General Minister and President of the United Church of Christ, the church to which Senator Barack Obama and his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, belong. Obama and Wright's church, Trinity UCC in Chicago, is one of a very few African American and Afrocentric congregations in the UCC, a largely White denomination. It is also the UCC's largest congregation.

A friend read me this statement by the Rev. Thomas over the phone earlier today and I found myself cheering. I reprint this statement in its entirety rather than giving you only a link to it because I think it is an outstanding piece of analysis and public theology. I hope that many people read it. I fear that today's speech by Senator Obama and its coverage have eclipsed this insightful essay. It is, I think, the strongest response to the recent controversy about Pastor Wright and Trinity Church.

If you feel as I do about the speech, please spread it far and wide.

March 17, 2008


What Kind of Prophet? Reflections on the Rhetoric of Preaching
in Light of Recent News Coverage of Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr.
and Trinity United Church of Christ

The Rev. John H. Thomas
General Minister and President
United Church of Christ

Over the weekend members of our church and others have been subjected to the relentless airing of two or three brief video clips of sermons by the Rev. Dr. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr., pastor of Trinity United Church of Christ for thirty-six years and, for over half of those years, pastor of Senator Barack Obama and his family. These video clips, and news stories about them, have been served up with frenzied and heated commentary by media personalities expressing shock that such language and sentiments could be uttered from the pulpit.

One is tempted to ask whether these commentators ever listen to the overcharged rhetoric of their own opinion shows. Even more to the point is to wonder whether they have a working knowledge of the history of preaching in the United States from the unrelentingly grim language of New England election day sermons to the fiery rhetoric of the Black church prophetic tradition. Maybe they prefer the false prophets with their happy homilies in Jeremiah who say to the people: "You shall not see the sword, nor shall you have famine, but I will give you true peace in this place." To which God responds, "The prophets are prophesying lies in my name; I did not send them, nor did I command them or speak to them. They are prophesying to you a lying vision, worthless divination, and the deceit of their own minds. . . . By sword and famine those prophets shall be consumed," (Jeremiah 14.14-15). The Biblical Jeremiah was coarse and provocative. Faithfulness, not respectability was the order of the day then. And now?

What's really going on here? First, it may state the obvious to point out that these television and radio shows have very little interest in Trinity Church or Jeremiah Wright. Those who sifted through hours of sermons searching for a few lurid phrases and those who have aired them repeatedly have only one intention. It is to wound a presidential candidate. In the process a congregation that does exceptional ministry and a pastor who has given his life to shape those ministries is caricatured and demonized. You don't have to be an Obama supporter to be alarmed at this. Will Clinton's United Methodist Church be next? Or McCain's Episcopal Church? Wouldn't we have been just as alarmed had it been Huckabee's Southern Baptist Church, or Romney's Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints?

Many of us would prefer to avoid the stark and startling language Pastor Wright used in these clips. But what was his real crime? He is condemned for using a mild "obscenity" in reference to the United States. This week we mark the fifth anniversary of the war in Iraq, a war conceived in deception and prosecuted in foolish arrogance. Nearly four thousand cherished Americans have been killed, countless more wounded, and tens of thousands of Iraqis slaughtered. Where is the real obscenity here? True patriotism requires a degree of self-criticism, even self-judgment that may not always be easy or genteel. Pastor Wright's judgment may be starker and more sweeping than many of us are prepared to accept. But is the soul of our nation served any better by the polite prayers and gentle admonitions that have gone without a real hearing for these five years while the dying and destruction continues?

We might like to think that racism is a thing of the past, that Martin Luther King's harmonious multi-racial vision, articulated in his speech at the Lincoln Memorial in 1963 and then struck down by an assassin's bullet in Memphis in 1968, has somehow been resurrected and now reigns throughout the land. Significant progress has been made. A black man is a legitimate candidate for President of the United States. A black woman serves as Secretary of State. The accomplishments are profound. But on the gritty streets of Chicago's south side where Trinity has planted itself, race continues to play favorites in failing urban school systems, unresponsive health care systems, crumbling infrastructure, and meager economic development. Are we to pretend all is well because much is, in fact, better than it used to be? Is it racist to name the racial divides that continue to afflict our nation, and to do so loudly? How ironic that a pastor and congregation which, for forty-five years, has cast its lot with a predominantly white denomination, participating fully in its wider church life and contributing generously to it, would be accused of racial exclusion and a failure to reach for racial reconciliation.

The gospel narrative of Palm Sunday's entrance into Jerusalem concludes with the overturning of the money changers' tables in the Temple courtyard. Here wealth and power and greed were challenged for the way the poor were oppressed to the point of exclusion from a share in the religious practices of the Temple. Today we watch as the gap between the obscenely wealthy and the obscenely poor widens. More and more of our neighbors are relegated to minimal health care or to no health care at all. Foreclosures destroy families while unscrupulous lenders seek bailouts from regulators who turned a blind eye to the impending crisis. Should the preacher today respond to this with only a whisper and a sigh?

Is Pastor Wright to be ridiculed and condemned for refusing to play the court prophet, blessing land and sovereign while pledging allegiance to our preoccupation with wealth and our fascination with weapons? In the United Church of Christ we honor diversity. For nearly four centuries we have respected dissent and have struggled to maintain the freedom of the pulpit. Not every pastor in the United Church of Christ will want to share Pastor Wright's rhetoric or his politics. Not every member will rise to shout "Amen!" But I trust we will all struggle in our own way to resist the lure of respectable religion that seeks to displace evangelical faith. For what this nation needs is not so much polite piety as the rough and radical word of the prophet calling us to repentance. And, as we struggle with that ancient calling, I pray we will be shrewd enough to name the hypocrisy of those who decry the mixing of religion and politics in order to serve their own political ends.

9 comments:

FranIAm said...

I read this a little while ago on my reader and now am on the blog to re-read and to comment.

This puts things in a different light. There has been such screaming over this, including at my blog, when I was really pointing to something else altogether.

Anyway, I thank you for sharing this dear Jane!

TC said...

More depth to the controversy here: http://acropolisreview.com/2008/03/barack-obama-condemns-reverend-jeremiah.html

Grandmère Mimi said...

Jane, what a wonderful essay! Thanks for bringing this to my attention. Context and perspective are what our sound-bite media people so sorely lack in their haste to bring us the latest excitement and then beat it to death. In this instance, they made me feel literally sick to my stomach. The Rev. Thomas gets it right.

Ken said...

Apart from Rev. Thomas's comments, I read Sen. Obama's speech. It is the finest political speech I have read since Robert Kennedy in 1968. It is genuine--a quality no other politician has matched since then. It occurred to me to sit this one out. I can't do that--not now. I can only pray Obama can maintain whatever lead he has, because I simply cannot bring myself to vote for someone with Hillary Clinton's blind ambition. Anyone who wants the job that badly probably doesn't deserve it. Obama, on the other hand, actually inspired me.

Anonymous said...

If Wright is truly a prophet as Thomas thinks, then for Barak to throw him to the wolves in order to gain the throne is even more terrifying than anything Wright may have uttered.

Anonymous said...

Yes the speech sounded Kennedy-esque. It was probably Bobby's old speech writer, what his name.

Jane R said...

Theodore (Ted) Sorensen. Not sure he is still alive.

Jane R said...

Ah, I checked, and he is still alive. Not only that, but he endorsed Obama a while back. Verrrry interesting. You're right that the speech has a Sorensen tone to it! Sorensen was born in 1928 so he's 79 (80 in May). His wife used to be my boss!

johnieb said...

I haven't attended to "Obama's" or "Sorenson's" (definitely one of the greatest speechwriters and authors, for that matter)latest work, but I am grateful for Thomas's statement. It makes me proud to have been associated with the UCC. I think I should let my friend the Rev. Thomas know (the one "down by the Riverside")